Agreements without Commitments? The U.S. congress and the U.S.-North Korea agreed framework, 1994–2002

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty years after the deal struck between the United States and North Korea over the nuclear crisis, the security environment on the Korean Peninsula remains unstable. When it comes to the U.S.-North Korea Agreed Framework from 1994 through 2002, previous research has paid scant attention to how the U.S. Congress responded to President Clinton’s accord with the Pyongyang regime. This article provides a rare empirical assessment of what led America’s lawmakers to uphold or overturn the executive agreements with North Korea. The bottom-line finding is that politics hardly stops at the water’s edge, with “politics-as-usual” forces such as partisan conflicts ultimately having derailed Congressional commitments to the U.S.-DPRK accords. The results shed light on how and why domestic politics often redirects the course of international agreements, particularly in the era of polarized politics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-112
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Defense Analysis
Volume27
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Korea Institute for Defense Analyses.

Keywords

  • Executive agreement
  • Legislative commitments
  • North Korea
  • U.S. congress
  • U.S.-North Korea agreed framework

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agreements without Commitments? The U.S. congress and the U.S.-North Korea agreed framework, 1994–2002'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this