Abstract
Background: Anti-LW is rarely identified, and it is known to have little clinical importance. However, it is often difficult to differentiate anti-LW from anti-D. Methods: Here, we report a case where anti-LW was identified for pre-transfusion testing in a patient suspected of having lymphoma. Results: His blood group was O RhD-positive. Anti-D specificity, weak pan-reactivity and 2+ reactivity in auto control were shown as a result of antibody identification. The reactions became weaker with DTT-treated RBCs, which confirmed the specificity of an anti-LW. The patient received 8 units of O RhD-positive pRBC before dis-charge without any transfusion reaction. Conclusions: In conclusion, anti-LWs may show mimicking specificity of anti-D for antibody identification testing, but their clinical significance is completely different. Therefore, their prompt identification is important.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 415-418 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Clinical Laboratory |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Verlag Klinisches Labor GmbH. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Anti-D antibody
- Anti-LW antibody
- Antibody identification testing
- Dithiothreitol treatment
- Lym-phoma
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-LW Confused with Anti-D: A Case Transfused RhD-positive RBCs and Literature Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver