Abstract
Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns at various locations. Materials and methods: A typodont maxillary left first molar was prepared for a lithium disilicate crown, scanned, and a master die fabricated. Three groups were created according to fabrication method (n = 10): conventional impression and press method (group C); scanning of definitive cast and milling method (group D); and intraoral scanning and milling method (group I). Assessment was performed using the triplescan protocol. At the buccopalatal and mesiodistal sections, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD), marginal gap (MG), axial internal gap (AI), and line angle internal gap (LI) were meas ured. Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used for statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Results: AMD values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). MG values in group C were signifi cantly lower than those in the buccal and distal areas in group D and all areas in group I (P < 0.05). AI values in the buccal and palatal areas in group D were significantly lower than those in the mesial and distal areas in group D and all areas in groups C and I (P < 0.05). LI values were significantly lower in group C than in groups D and I (P < 0.05). Conclusion: All three methods were clinically acceptable except for the marginal fit of the intraoral scanning and mill ing method, which was on the borderline of a clinically acceptable fit. (Int J Comput Dent 2023;26(1): 37–47; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b3818305)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 37-47 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Journal of Computerized Dentistry |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH
Keywords
- CAD/CAM
- internal fit
- lithium disilicate ceramic
- marginal fit
- preparation
- press system