Comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: Use of propensity-score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias

Hae Sun Suh, Joel W. Hay, Kathleen A. Johnson, Jason N. Doctor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in reducing risk of cardiovascular disease in real-world settings is unknown. Methods: A retrospective database analysis was performed using a large managed care claims database of patients identified with type 2 diabetes based on diagnosis codes from January 2002 through December 2003 and continuously enrolled for the entire study period, 5.5years. A statin plus fibrate combination therapy group (patients who used statins less than 6months and augmented with fibrates for more than 6 months) and a statin monotherapy group (patients who used statins persistently) among patients with type 2 diabetes were followed for 3years to examine the relationship between the intervention and cardiovascular events using a multivariable logistic regression model, propensity score method, and instrumental variable approach. Results: The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group of 318 and the statin monotherapy group of 9928 were identified from 75515 diabetics. After adjusting for factors that can impact cardiovascular outcomes, the combination therapy group did not significantly experience a reduction in cardiovascular disease, as compared with the statin monotherapy group (OR=0.77; p=0.083). The statin plus fibrate combination therapy group was significantly associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events after propensity matching (OR=0.53; p=0.002). Using the physician prescribing preference instrument to adjust for unmeasured confounding, we did not find evidence that subjects in the statin plus fibrate combination therapy group versus stain monotherapy group experienced a significant reduction in cardiovascular events (p=0.124). Conclusions: We did not find a difference in effectiveness regarding cardiovascular outcomes between the statin plus fibrate combination therapy and the statin monotherapy after controlling for hidden bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-484
Number of pages15
JournalPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • Instrumental variable
  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Propensity score
  • Statin and fibrate
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative effectiveness of statin plus fibrate combination therapy and statin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: Use of propensity-score and instrumental variable methods to adjust for treatment-selection bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this