Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A propensity score analysis

  • Gi Ae Kim
  • , Ju Hyun Shim
  • , Sang Min Yoon
  • , Jinhong Jung
  • , Jong Hoon Kim
  • , Min Hee Ryu
  • , Baek Yeol Ryoo
  • , Yoon Koo Kang
  • , Danbi Lee
  • , Kang Mo Kim
  • , Young Suk Lim
  • , Han Chu Lee
  • , Young Hwa Chung
  • , Yung Sang Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy (RT) versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study involved 557 patients with HCC with PVTT who initially received chemoembolization (1997-2002; n = 295), chemoembolization and RT (2003-2008; n = 196), or sorafenib (2009-2012; n = 66) according to eligibility criteria among an initial population of 617. The three groups were divided into three pairs (chemoembolization vs chemoembolization/RT, chemoembolization vs sorafenib, and chemoembolization/RT vs sorafenib), and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were compared by propensity-score analyses. Results: The chemoembolization/RT group had longer median TTP and OS than the chemoembolization-alone and sorafenib groups (P < .001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that chemoembolization/RT treatment was an independent predictor of favorable TTP and OS. In the matched cohort, median TTP and OS were significantly longer in the chemoembolization/RT group than the chemoembolization-alone group (102 pairs; TTP, 8.7 mo vs 3.6 mo [P < .001]; OS, 11.4 mo vs 7.4 mo [P = .023]) or the sorafenib group (30 pairs; TTP, 5.1 mo vs 1.6 mo [P < .001]; OS, 8.2 mo vs 3.2 mo [P < .001]), in agreement with the inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) outcomes. In matching analyses, the chemoembolization-alone group had longer median TTP and OS than the sorafenib group (46 pairs; TTP, 3.4 mo vs 1.8 mo [P < .001]; OS, 5.9 mo vs 4.4 mo [P = .003]). There was no significant difference in terms of OS with the IPTW approach (P = .108), but there was one in terms of TTP (P < .001). Conclusions: Within the limitation of a retrospective study, the present data indicate that transarterial chemoembolization combined with RT could be considered as an alternative to the standard sorafenib in the treatment of patients with advancedstage HCC with PVTT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)320-329.e6
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© SIR, 2015.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A propensity score analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this