TY - JOUR
T1 - Costal Chondrocyte–Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects
T2 - A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial
AU - Yoon, Kyoung Ho
AU - Lee, Jungsun
AU - Park, Jae Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Background: Costal chondrocyte–derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up. Results: The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; P <.0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; P =.023 and P =.017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group. Conclusion: The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years’ follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture. Registration: NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
AB - Background: Costal chondrocyte–derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively. Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up. Results: The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; P <.0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; P =.023 and P =.017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group. Conclusion: The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years’ follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture. Registration: NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
KW - autologous chondrocyte implantation
KW - cartilage repair
KW - chondral lesion
KW - costal cartilage
KW - pellet culture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182861589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/03635465231222797
DO - 10.1177/03635465231222797
M3 - Article
C2 - 38230875
AN - SCOPUS:85182861589
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 52
SP - 362
EP - 367
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 2
ER -