Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Discussions of the uniqueness of the sage's mind-and-heart in the Horak debate

  • Suk Yoon Moon
  • , Hansang A. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The discussions on the uniqueness of the sages' mind-and-heart in the Horak debate of the late Joseon dynasty occurred in regard to two major points of contention. The first regarded the different interpretations of the meaning of weifa, or the original state of the mind, and the second concerned mingde, or the original power of the mind. The Horak debate discussed whether sages and commoners had identical mind-and-heart; the debate should be understood in terms of the serious social inequalities inherent in late Joseon as well as the self-identity of the literati-officials of the time. Han Won-jin claimed that physical endowment in the weifa state had gradations or variations, whereas Yi Gan claimed that, in the weifa state, qi was in its original condition and therefore not subject to gradations or variations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-228
Number of pages28
JournalKorea Journal
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Li
  • Mind-andheart and nature
  • Mingde
  • Qi
  • Uniqueness of the sage's mind
  • Weifa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussions of the uniqueness of the sage's mind-and-heart in the Horak debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this