Abstract
The discussions on the uniqueness of the sages' mind-and-heart in the Horak debate of the late Joseon dynasty occurred in regard to two major points of contention. The first regarded the different interpretations of the meaning of weifa, or the original state of the mind, and the second concerned mingde, or the original power of the mind. The Horak debate discussed whether sages and commoners had identical mind-and-heart; the debate should be understood in terms of the serious social inequalities inherent in late Joseon as well as the self-identity of the literati-officials of the time. Han Won-jin claimed that physical endowment in the weifa state had gradations or variations, whereas Yi Gan claimed that, in the weifa state, qi was in its original condition and therefore not subject to gradations or variations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 201-228 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Korea Journal |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Li
- Mind-andheart and nature
- Mingde
- Qi
- Uniqueness of the sage's mind
- Weifa
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Discussions of the uniqueness of the sage's mind-and-heart in the Horak debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver