Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dynamic radiographic results of different semi-rigid fusion devices for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: "Dynamic Rod" vs. "Dynamic Screw Head"

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To assess the clinical outcomes and compare the segmental range of motion (ROM) at the implanted L4-L5 level, the cranial and caudal adjacent levels, and the ROM of the whole lumbar spine after semi-rigid lumbar fusion with 2 different devices. Material and Methods: Patients with neurogenic claudication, due to grade 1 spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis at levels L4-L5, were treated either Bio-flex® (n = 28) and Cosmic® (n = 23); discectomy was not performed at any level. The clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. All patients underwent neutral, flexion, and extension radiography before the surgery and after 2 years postoperatively. ROM was assessed at the level of L4-L5, L3-L4, L5-S1, and at the whole lumbar spine. Results: According to clinical outcomes, 82% and 78% of patients in the BioFlex and Cosmic groups, respectively, had a good or excellent result. In both groups, there was significant reduction of the segmental ROM at the implanted L4-L5 level (p = 0.039 and 0.011). Conclusion: These outcomes may play a role in decreasing the risk of ASD after dynamic stabilization, at least 2 years after surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-273
Number of pages6
JournalTurkish Neurosurgery
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Adjacent segment degeneration
  • Adjacent segment disease
  • Bioflex
  • Cosmic
  • Dynamic stabilization
  • Lumbar fusion surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic radiographic results of different semi-rigid fusion devices for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: "Dynamic Rod" vs. "Dynamic Screw Head"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this