TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Midcheek Lift According to Dissection Plane and Range
T2 - An Anatomical Study
AU - Kyung, Hyunwoo
AU - Park, Yunsung
AU - Oh, Sang Ha
AU - Kim, Dong Woon
AU - Seo, Young Joon
AU - Song, Seung Han
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/5/1
Y1 - 2024/5/1
N2 - 10.1093/asj/sjad378Background: Midcheek lift has been performed for cosmetic or reconstructive surgery of the lower eyelid. For midcheek lift through the subciliary incision, preperiosteal and subperiosteal dissections are the most often implemented, with good clinical outcomes. However, a comparative assessment of the effects of these 2 methods had not been conducted. Objectives: In this study we compared the effects of midcheek lift according to preperiosteal or subperiosteal plane and range of midfacial dissection. Methods: Forty hemifaces of 20 fresh cadavers were dissected. One side of the hemiface underwent preperiosteal dissection, and the other side underwent subperiosteal dissection. After dissections of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 mm and all of the midcheek area from the inferior orbital rim, the length of the elevated lid-cheek junction was measured by placing upward traction on the lateral portion of the lower lid. Results: In both methods, the length of the midcheek lift increased as the dissection progressed, and the length of the lift on the lateral side was greater than that on the medial side. The length of the pulled skin in the preperiosteal group was the greatest in most cases. However, in the full dissection cases, the midcheek lift length was not statistically different between the 2 surgical methods, especially on the lateral side. Conclusions: Flap elevation in lower blepharoplasty surgery can be predicted based on the surgical method and dissection range. Implementing a surgical plan that takes this into account can enhance both reconstruction and aesthetic surgery outcomes in the midcheek area.
AB - 10.1093/asj/sjad378Background: Midcheek lift has been performed for cosmetic or reconstructive surgery of the lower eyelid. For midcheek lift through the subciliary incision, preperiosteal and subperiosteal dissections are the most often implemented, with good clinical outcomes. However, a comparative assessment of the effects of these 2 methods had not been conducted. Objectives: In this study we compared the effects of midcheek lift according to preperiosteal or subperiosteal plane and range of midfacial dissection. Methods: Forty hemifaces of 20 fresh cadavers were dissected. One side of the hemiface underwent preperiosteal dissection, and the other side underwent subperiosteal dissection. After dissections of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 mm and all of the midcheek area from the inferior orbital rim, the length of the elevated lid-cheek junction was measured by placing upward traction on the lateral portion of the lower lid. Results: In both methods, the length of the midcheek lift increased as the dissection progressed, and the length of the lift on the lateral side was greater than that on the medial side. The length of the pulled skin in the preperiosteal group was the greatest in most cases. However, in the full dissection cases, the midcheek lift length was not statistically different between the 2 surgical methods, especially on the lateral side. Conclusions: Flap elevation in lower blepharoplasty surgery can be predicted based on the surgical method and dissection range. Implementing a surgical plan that takes this into account can enhance both reconstruction and aesthetic surgery outcomes in the midcheek area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190176730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/asj/sjad378
DO - 10.1093/asj/sjad378
M3 - Article
C2 - 38124346
AN - SCOPUS:85190176730
SN - 1090-820X
VL - 44
SP - 473
EP - 481
JO - Aesthetic Surgery Journal
JF - Aesthetic Surgery Journal
IS - 5
ER -