Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Pattern on Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the EPIC-CAD Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Jae Sung Yu
  • , Min Soo Cho
  • , Do Yoon Kang
  • , Jung Min Ahn
  • , Jung Bok Lee
  • , Yong Seog Oh
  • , Chang Hoon Lee
  • , Eue Keun Choi
  • , Ji Hyun Lee
  • , Chang Hee Kwon
  • , Gyung Min Park
  • , Hyung Oh Choi
  • , Kyung Ha Park
  • , Kyoung Min Park
  • , Jong min Hwang
  • , Ki Dong Yoo
  • , Young Rak Cho
  • , Ji Hyun Kim
  • , Ki Won Hwang
  • , Eun Sun Jin
  • Osung Kwon, Ki Hun Kim, Seung Jung Park, Gi Byoung Nam, Duk Woo Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a risk of stroke or systemic embolism similar to nonparoxysmal (persistent or permanent) AF. However, whether the optimal antithrombotic strategy in patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease differs by AF pattern remains uncertain. METHODS: This prespecified substudy of the EPIC-CAD (Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial compared edoxaban monotherapy with dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent) in patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease. Stratified analyses were performed by AF pattern. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned urgent revascularization, major bleeding, or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding within 12 months. RESULTS: Among 1040 patients, 575 (55.3%) had paroxysmal and 465 (44.7%) had nonparoxysmal AF. The 12-month primary outcome rate was similar between paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF (10.3% versus 12.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.15 [95% CI, 0.79–1.68]). Edoxaban monotherapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary outcome than dual antithrombotic therapy in both paroxysmal AF (4.6% versus 16.2%; adjusted HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12–0.42]) and nonparoxysmal AF (9.3% versus 15.0%; adjusted HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32–0.87]). No significant interaction was observed between antithrombotic strategy and AF pattern (P for interaction=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, edoxaban monotherapy significantly reduced net adverse clinical events at 12 months compared with dual antithrombotic therapy, irrespective of AF pattern. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03718559.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere046966
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. JAHA is available at: www.ahajournals.org/journal/jaha

Keywords

  • antithrombotic therapy
  • atrial fibrillation
  • coronary artery disease
  • edoxaban

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Pattern on Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the EPIC-CAD Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this