Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of renal function on edoxaban antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: a prespecified analysis of the EPIC-CAD trial

  • Joong Min Lee
  • , Min Soo Cho
  • , Do Yoon Kang
  • , Jung Min Ahn
  • , Yong Seog Oh
  • , Chang Hoon Lee
  • , Eue Keun Choi
  • , Ji Hyun Lee
  • , Chang Hee Kwon
  • , Gyung Min Park
  • , Hyung Oh Choi
  • , Kyoung Ha Park
  • , Kyoung Min Park
  • , Jongmin Hwang
  • , Ki Dong Yoo
  • , Young Rak Cho
  • , Ji Hyun Kim
  • , Ki Won Hwang
  • , Eun Sun Jin
  • , Osung Kwon
  • Ki Hun Kim, Seung Jung Park, Gi Byoung Nam, Duk Woo Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal function is a critical factor of ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving antithrombotic therapy. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of renal dysfunction in patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: The Edoxaban Versus Edoxaban With antiPlatelet Agent In Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EPIC-CAD) trial randomised patients to edoxaban monotherapy or dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent). In this prespecified analysis, patients were stratified by creatinine clearance into low (<50 mL/min) or high (≥50 mL/min) groups according to edoxaban dosereduction criteria. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE: death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, urgent revascularisation, or major/clinically relevant non-major bleeding) at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 1,040 randomised patients, 252 (24.2%) had low creatinine clearance; these patients were older and had more comorbidities compared with the 788 patients (75.8%) with high creatinine clearance. Patients with low creatinine clearance experienced higher risks of NACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.49; p=0.004), ischaemic events (HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.09-6.70; p=0.032), and bleeding (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.01-2.34; p=0.046). At 12 months, edoxaban monotherapy reduced NACE compared with dual therapy in both the low (12.1% vs 21.7%, HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.98; p=0.042) and high creatinine clearance groups (5.2% vs 14.5%, HR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.65; p<0.001), with no interaction (p for interaction=0.53). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF and stable CAD, edoxaban monotherapy led to a lower risk of primary NACE than dual antithrombotic therapy, regardless of renal function. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03718559).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e432-e443
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Europa Group 2026.

Keywords

  • anticoagulant
  • atrial fibrillation
  • coronary artery disease
  • creatinine clearance
  • haemorrhage
  • ischaemia
  • renal function

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of renal function on edoxaban antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: a prespecified analysis of the EPIC-CAD trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this