Abstract
In this paper I will first consider Bird's cases against the conditional analysis of dispositions and defend them from Gundersen's objection. This does not mean that I believe that Bird's cases are successful. To the contrary, I take it that we can save the conditional analysis from Bird's cases by taking Lewis's two-step approach to dispositions. However, I will go on to argue that if Bird's cases are supplemented with the assumption that dispositions are intrinsic matter, they are able to do what they are intended to do.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 573-580 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving bird's antidotes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver