Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is laser-assisted hatching better than mechanical method for enhancing pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles?

  • Y. J. Lee
  • , S. C. Kim
  • , J. K. Joo
  • , H. G. Kim
  • , G. R. Ko
  • , C. W. Kim
  • , K. S. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) compared with mechanical-assisted hatching (MAH) for en- hancing clinical outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocysts (FTBs) transfer cycles. Materials and Methods: The culture of all pronucleate embryos to the blastocyst stage and the selection of blastocysts ≥ grade 3BB (Gardner and Schooleraft score), followed by FTBs trans- fer cycles with LAH (n=105) or with MAH (n=101). Clinical outcomes including clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were investi- gated. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between LAH and MAH groups in FTBs transfer cycles. Conclusion: LAH does not improve pregnancy outcomes significantly compared to MAH in FTBs transfer cycles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-69
Number of pages5
JournalClinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
©2020 Lee et al.

Keywords

  • Frozen-thawed blastocyst
  • Laser-assisted hatching
  • Mechanical-assisted hatching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is laser-assisted hatching better than mechanical method for enhancing pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this