TY - GEN
T1 - Kriging/RBF-hybrid response surface method for highly nonlinear functions
AU - Namura, Nobuo
AU - Shimoyama, Koji
AU - Jeong, Shinkyu
AU - Obayashi, Shigeru
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - In order to construct a response surface of an unknown function robustly, a hybrid method between the Kriging model and the radial basis function (RBF) networks is proposed in this paper. In the hybrid method, RBF approximates the macro trend of the function and the Kriging model estimates the micro trend. Then, hybrid methods using two types of model selection criteria (MSC): leave-one-out cross-validation and generalized cross-validation for RBF and the ordinary Kriging (OK) model for comparison are applied to three types of one-dimensional test problems, in which the accuracy of each response surface is compared by shapes and root mean square errors. As a result, the hybrid models are more accurate than the OK model for highly nonlinear functions because the hybrid models can capture the macro trend of the function properly by RBF, but the OK model cannot. However, because the accuracy of the hybrid method turns down significantly when RBF causes overfitting, stable MSC is required. In addition, the hybrid models can find out the global optimum with a few sample points by using the Kriging model's approximation errors effectively.
AB - In order to construct a response surface of an unknown function robustly, a hybrid method between the Kriging model and the radial basis function (RBF) networks is proposed in this paper. In the hybrid method, RBF approximates the macro trend of the function and the Kriging model estimates the micro trend. Then, hybrid methods using two types of model selection criteria (MSC): leave-one-out cross-validation and generalized cross-validation for RBF and the ordinary Kriging (OK) model for comparison are applied to three types of one-dimensional test problems, in which the accuracy of each response surface is compared by shapes and root mean square errors. As a result, the hybrid models are more accurate than the OK model for highly nonlinear functions because the hybrid models can capture the macro trend of the function properly by RBF, but the OK model cannot. However, because the accuracy of the hybrid method turns down significantly when RBF causes overfitting, stable MSC is required. In addition, the hybrid models can find out the global optimum with a few sample points by using the Kriging model's approximation errors effectively.
KW - Kriging model
KW - model selection criteria
KW - radial basis function networks
KW - response surface methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051987988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CEC.2011.5949933
DO - 10.1109/CEC.2011.5949933
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:80051987988
SN - 9781424478347
T3 - 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2011
SP - 2534
EP - 2541
BT - 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2011
T2 - 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2011
Y2 - 5 June 2011 through 8 June 2011
ER -