Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty with a stem extension

  • Jae Hoon Shin
  • , Moon Jong Chang
  • , Seung Baik Kang
  • , Chong Bum Chang
  • , Dong Hwi Kim
  • , Seung Ah Lee
  • , Su Jung Mok

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is little information about the management and clinical outcomes of the periprosthetic fracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a stem extension. The purposes of this study were to demonstrate management of the periprosthetic fractures after TKA with a stem extension, to report treatment outcomes, and to determine whether dual-plate fixation is superior to single-plate fixation regarding the radiographic bone union time and incidence of metal failure.This retrospective study included 15 knees with periprosthetic fractures after TKA using a stem extension. We demonstrated the fracture characteristics and management according to the fracture location and implant stability. The radiographic union time was determined. Complications, range of motion, and functional outcomes, including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Score were assessed. Periprosthetic fractures after TKA with stem extension were 1 metaphyseal fracture without implant loosening, 7 diaphyseal fractures adjacent to the stem without implant loosening, 3 diaphyseal fractures away from the stem without implant loosening, and 4 fractures with implant loosening.Treatment included immobilization using a long leg cast, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and re-revision TKA. There was no difference in functional outcomes and range of motion pre- and posttreatment. The complications included 2 cases of subsequent implant loosening. Patients in the dual-plating required a shorter bony union time than those in the single-plating (2.4 ± 1.1 vs 7.4 ± 2.2 months; P = .003).Periprosthetic fractures after TKA with stem extension could be managed individually according to the fracture location and implant stability. Complications were not uncommon even if patients were able to return to their preinjury functional level posttreatment. To avoid complications after ORIF, the dual plate was superior to the single plate, and subtle implant loosening should not be overlooked.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e16088
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume98
Issue number25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty with a stem extension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this