TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimum 10-Year Results of Single- Versus Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
T2 - Clinical, Radiologic, and Survivorship Outcomes
AU - Yoon, Kyoung Ho
AU - Kim, Eung Ju
AU - Kwon, Yoo Beom
AU - Kim, Sang Gyun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Background: Biomechanical studies have shown that double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) is better than single-bundle (SB) PCLR in restoring normal biomechanical function and stability. However, most clinical studies report no differences between the technical methods, and there is yet no long-term clinical comparative study. Hypothesis: DB PCLR would show superior results and survivorship outcomes to those of SB PCLR in long-term follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated 64 patients who underwent primary PCLR between 2000 and 2008 and were followed up for a minimum of 10 years: 28 patients underwent SB PCLR (mean ± SD: age, 29.1 ± 12.2 years), and 36 underwent DB PCLR (age, 27.0 ± 9.2 years). Clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score), side-to-side difference in stress radiographs, osteoarthritis progression, and survival rate were compared between the SB and DB groups at the last follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, all clinical scores showed no significant differences between the SB and DB groups. The mean side-to-side difference in stress radiographs (SB, 5.3 ± 3.5 mm; DB, 5.0 ± 3.8 mm; P =.828) and osteoarthritis progression (SB, 14.3%; DB, 13.9%; P =.964) were not different between the groups. The 15-year survival rate was 82.1% for SB PCLR and 83.7% for DB PCLR. Conclusion: Both the SB and DB techniques for PCLR showed satisfactory long-term clinical results and survivorship outcomes. There were no significant differences between SB and DB PCLR in clinical, radiologic, and survivorship outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinical Relevance: DB PCLR did not show superior clinical results to those of SB PCLR in the long-term follow-up. These results should be considered in the surgical planning for PCLR.
AB - Background: Biomechanical studies have shown that double-bundle (DB) posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) is better than single-bundle (SB) PCLR in restoring normal biomechanical function and stability. However, most clinical studies report no differences between the technical methods, and there is yet no long-term clinical comparative study. Hypothesis: DB PCLR would show superior results and survivorship outcomes to those of SB PCLR in long-term follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated 64 patients who underwent primary PCLR between 2000 and 2008 and were followed up for a minimum of 10 years: 28 patients underwent SB PCLR (mean ± SD: age, 29.1 ± 12.2 years), and 36 underwent DB PCLR (age, 27.0 ± 9.2 years). Clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity score), side-to-side difference in stress radiographs, osteoarthritis progression, and survival rate were compared between the SB and DB groups at the last follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, all clinical scores showed no significant differences between the SB and DB groups. The mean side-to-side difference in stress radiographs (SB, 5.3 ± 3.5 mm; DB, 5.0 ± 3.8 mm; P =.828) and osteoarthritis progression (SB, 14.3%; DB, 13.9%; P =.964) were not different between the groups. The 15-year survival rate was 82.1% for SB PCLR and 83.7% for DB PCLR. Conclusion: Both the SB and DB techniques for PCLR showed satisfactory long-term clinical results and survivorship outcomes. There were no significant differences between SB and DB PCLR in clinical, radiologic, and survivorship outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinical Relevance: DB PCLR did not show superior clinical results to those of SB PCLR in the long-term follow-up. These results should be considered in the surgical planning for PCLR.
KW - clinical outcome
KW - double-bundle
KW - posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
KW - single-bundle
KW - survivorship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061806413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0363546518825257
DO - 10.1177/0363546518825257
M3 - Article
C2 - 30753096
AN - SCOPUS:85061806413
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 47
SP - 822
EP - 827
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 4
ER -