Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Campylobacter jejuni in Ground Meat Products in Korea

  • Jeeyeon Lee
  • , Heeyoung Lee
  • , Soomin Lee
  • , Sejeong Kim
  • , Jimyeong Ha
  • , Yukyung Choi
  • , Hyemin Oh
  • , Yujin Kim
  • , Yewon Lee
  • , Ki Sun Yoon
  • , Kunho Seo
  • , Yohan Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated Campylobacter jejuni risk in ground meat products. The C. jejuni prevalence in ground meat products was investigated. To develop the predictive model, survival data of C. jejuni were collected at 4℃–30℃ during storage, and the data were fitted using the Weibull model. In addition, the storage temperature and time of ground meat products were investigated during distribution. The consumption amount and frequency of ground meat products were investigated by interviewing 1,500 adults. The prevalence, temperature, time, and consumption data were analyzed by @RISK to generate probabilistic distributions. In 224 samples of ground meat products, there were no C. jejuni–contaminated samples. A scenario with a series of probabilistic distributions, a predictive model and a dose-response model was prepared to calculate the probability of illness, and it showed that the probability of foodborne illness caused by C. jejuni per person per day from ground meat products was 5.68×10–10, which can be considered low risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-575
Number of pages11
JournalFood Science of Animal Resources
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.

Keywords

  • Campylobacter jejuni
  • Foodborne illness
  • Ground meat product
  • Microbial risk assessment
  • Predictive model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Campylobacter jejuni in Ground Meat Products in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this