Reprint of: Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Are Improved Compared to Transtibial Pull-Out Repair of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent an all-inside repair (with a bony trough) versus transtibial pull-out repair in medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Methods: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent MMPRT repairs in nonacute tears in age over 40 from November 2015 to June 2019. All patients were divided into a transtibial pull-out repair group and an all-inside repair group. Different surgical techniques were used during different time frames. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. The data collected included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at the 1-year follow-up to assess meniscus extrusion, signal intensity, and healing. Results: The final cohort consisted of 28 patients in the all-inside repair group and 16 in the transtibial pull-out repair group. In the all-inside repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores improved significantly at the 2-year follow-up. In the transtibial pull-out repair group, the IKDC Subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner scores did not improve significantly at the 2-year follow-up. Postoperative extrusion ratio increased in both groups, and patient-reported outcomes at follow-up did not differ between the two groups The change in the extrusion ratio was significantly less in the all-inside repair group (P = .009), as was the postoperative meniscus signal (P = .011). Postoperative MRI revealed significantly better healing in the all-inside group (P = .041). Conclusion: All-inside repair improved the functional outcome scores. Radiologically, all-inside repair was better than transtibial pull-out repair. All-inside repair may be a viable MMPRT treatment option. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.