Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effects of defect type and depth, and measurement direction on the implant stability quotient value

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of defect type and depth as well as measurement direction on implant stability in an ex vivo peri-implant bovine rib bone model. Six kinds of defects (3-wall 2.5 mm, 3-wall 5 mm, 1-wall 2.5 mm, 1-wall 5 mm, circumferential 2.5 mm, circumferential 5 mm), and control (no defect) were prepared in 14 bovine rib bones. A total of 84 defects and 14 controls were created. The same type and size of implants (4 ×10 mm) were placed in each group. The thickness of cortical bone and the insertion torque were measured for each defect, and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was measured 3 times from 4 different directions. The thickness of cortical bone ranged from 2.71-3.18 mm. Insertion torque decreased as the defect size increased. As the defect size for the same defect depth increased, the ISQ value decreased (P<.001). There were significant differences between the ISQ values obtained with different measurement directions only between the control and 3-wall 5 mm defect (P <.0001). The ISQ value opposite to the defect direction was higher than that in the defect direction in all 3 directions of the 3-wall and 1-wall 5 mm defects. ISQ values were influenced by defect type and depth. Loss of cortical bone reduced the stability of implants and reduced the ISQ value. Measurement direction also influenced ISQ values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-656
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Oral Implantology
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Keywords

  • Defect depth
  • Defect type
  • Implant stability
  • Implant stability quotient (ISQ)
  • Resonance frequency analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of defect type and depth, and measurement direction on the implant stability quotient value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this