Abstract
The national health insurance systems in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are considered to have shown successful performance. These three countries achieved universal health coverage through systems with different degrees of integration and the unification of disparate schemes. Japan still maintains a fragmented system based on occupational and residential insurance schemes, while Taiwan and South Korea have achieved a unified system with single payers and are moving toward a more integrated system in terms of transfer across the different schemes within the system. By focusing on institutions, policies, and actors, this study highlights diverse forms of inter-and intra-sectoral integration mechanisms and pathways that have been used to achieve health equity in these countries. We show that the experiences of these three countries offer good cases for comparative research on how countries with rapid industrialization facing the task of developing their welfare systems have overcome fragmentation and unified their systems of welfare provision in equitable and sustainable ways.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 35-68 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Korea Observer |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by a grant from the Kyung Hee University in 2009(KHU-20090645). The authors would like to thank the staffs of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNR1SD) for their lively discussions and appreciate Jeanyoung Lee's help in collecting data and editing the manuscript
Keywords
- Health insurance
- Japan
- South Korea
- Taiwan
- Welfare system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of fragmented systems of welfare provision: The national health care systems of Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver