Abstract
Despite its consistent and latent appearance in feminist accounts of intimate partner violence (IPV), the characterization of IPV as an elaborately ordered relationship whose norms are backed up by force is notably absent from the empirical IPV literature. Drawing on Emery’s typology of IPV, we hypothesized a curvilinear relationship between order and IPV injury. We developed a measure of relationship order and implemented it in a representative, randomly selected cluster sample of 250 families from Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Controlling for the severity of the IPV, higher levels of order, but not lower levels, are associated with higher numbers of reported IPV injuries. Theoretical and practical implications of order as a risk factor are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-82 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Interpersonal Violence |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 Jan 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2014.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- IPV injury
- Mongolia
- domestic violence
- order
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Peril of Order? IPV, Injury, and Order in Mongolian Families'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver