Three new phthalide glycosides from the rhizomes of cnidium officinale and their recovery effect on damaged otic hair cells in zebrafish

Hyoung Geun Kim, Seon Min Oh, Na Woo Kim, Ji Heon Shim, Youn Hee Nam, Trong Nguyen Nguyen, Min Ho Lee, Dae Young Lee, Tong Ho Kang, Nam In Baek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The extract from Cnidium officinale rhizomes was shown in a prior experiment to markedly recover otic hair cells in zebrafish damaged by neomycin. The current study was brought about to identify the principal metabolite. Column chromatography using octadecyl SiO2 and SiO2 was performed to isolate the major metabolites from the active fraction. The chemical structures were resolved on the basis of spectroscopic data, including NMR, IR, MS, and circular dichroism (CD) data. The isolated phthalide glycosides were assessed for their recovery effect on damaged otic hair cells in neomycin-treated zebrafish. Three new phthalide glycosides were isolated, and their chemical structures, including stereochemical characteristics, were determined. Two glycosides (0.1 µM) showed a recovery effect (p < 0.01) on otic hair cells in zebrafish affected by neomycin ototoxicity. Repeated column chromatography led to the isolation of three new phthalide glycosides, named ligusticosides C (1), D (2), and E (3). Ligusticoside C and ligusticoside E recovered damaged otic hair cells in zebrafish.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7034
JournalMolecules
Volume26
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

  • Circular dichroism
  • Cnidium officinale
  • Ligusticoside
  • Otic hair cells
  • Phthalide
  • Stereostruc-ture
  • Zebrafish

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Three new phthalide glycosides from the rhizomes of cnidium officinale and their recovery effect on damaged otic hair cells in zebrafish'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this