TY - GEN
T1 - Using Walsh functions in electrical impedance tomography
AU - Woo, Eung Je
AU - Pallas-Areny, Ramon
AU - Webster, John G.
AU - Tompkins, Willis J.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2004 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - The authors propose a measurement method using Walsh functions in 32-electrode electrical impedance tomography. By injecting currents in spatial Walsh function patterns, one can exploit the simplicity of pulse type injection and obtain the optimal signal-to-noise ratio or distinguishability of sinusoidal injection. Once boundary voltage data for the injection of all 31 patterns of Walsh functions are measured, all 31 optimal current patterns can be computed. One can also synthesize the voltage data due to the injection of the optimal current patterns without actually injecting the optimal current patterns. It is pointed out that the use of Walsh functions simplifies the design of current sources since only two levels of current (+1 and -1) are required whereas sinusoidal injection requires a DAC to produce many different values of currents. Compared to diagonal or neighboring types of pulses as injection current patterns, Walsh function injection provides much better information about the interior of the subject since Walsh functions simulate low as well as high spatial frequency patterns. Walsh functions also have the advantage of computational simplicity since they take the value of only +1, -1, or zero.
AB - The authors propose a measurement method using Walsh functions in 32-electrode electrical impedance tomography. By injecting currents in spatial Walsh function patterns, one can exploit the simplicity of pulse type injection and obtain the optimal signal-to-noise ratio or distinguishability of sinusoidal injection. Once boundary voltage data for the injection of all 31 patterns of Walsh functions are measured, all 31 optimal current patterns can be computed. One can also synthesize the voltage data due to the injection of the optimal current patterns without actually injecting the optimal current patterns. It is pointed out that the use of Walsh functions simplifies the design of current sources since only two levels of current (+1 and -1) are required whereas sinusoidal injection requires a DAC to produce many different values of currents. Compared to diagonal or neighboring types of pulses as injection current patterns, Walsh function injection provides much better information about the interior of the subject since Walsh functions simulate low as well as high spatial frequency patterns. Walsh functions also have the advantage of computational simplicity since they take the value of only +1, -1, or zero.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025556761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:0025556761
SN - 0879425598
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology
SP - 124
EP - 125
BT - Biomedical Engineering Perspectives
PB - Publ by IEEE
T2 - Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Y2 - 1 November 1990 through 4 November 1990
ER -