What Remains After the Decline of Humanism and Education? Revisiting the Elmau Speech by Peter Sloterdijk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sloterdijk's 1999 lecture, known as the Elmau Speech, posited that all existing humanisms, including Heidegger's Fundamental Ontology, were rendered obsolete by the emergence of the so-called new media, and that education faced a similar fate. Taking a step further, the Elmau Speech establishes a connection between post-humanism in the sense of post-literary and postepistolary and Nietzsche's prophetic philosophy, suggesting the potential for genetic intervention in human life and education, thereby giving rise to social controversy. This paper begins by examining Heidegger's Letter on Humanism, which offers criticism of traditional humanisms and introduces his concept of Fundamental Ontology. It then delves into Sloterdijk's critique of Heidegger in Rules for the Human Zoo, as well as Sloterdijk's own conception of posthumanism, analyzing their implications for contemporary education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-331
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in Philosophy and Education
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.

Keywords

  • Education
  • Humanism
  • Martin Heidegger
  • Peter Sloterdijk
  • Posthumanism
  • The Elmau Speech

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Remains After the Decline of Humanism and Education? Revisiting the Elmau Speech by Peter Sloterdijk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this