Abstract
Introduction: This study was conducted to compare hatching rates after assisted hatching, re-expansion rates after trophectoderm biopsy, and survival rates after cryopreservation using different methods of assisted hatching and biopsy in mouse embryo. Materials and Methods: Five-week-old female mice (C57BL/CBA) were superovulated, and two-cell embryos were collected. All embryos were cultured to blastocyst stage. For assisted hatching and separating trophectoderm from blastocyst, laser device and hand-made pipette were used respectively. Hatching rates after assisted hatching, re-expansion rates after trophectoderm biopsy, and survival rates after cryopreservation were calculated. Results: Hatching rate was 92% in mechanically assisted hatching group and 90% in laser group, respectively. After mechanically assisted hatching, re-expansion rate was 91.3% and survival rate was 87% in biopsy by pipette and laser group, respectively. In laser hatching group, re-expansion rate was 88.9% with biopsy by pipette and survival rate was 84.4% with biopsy by laser. Conclusion: Throughout the study, mechanical technique and laser technique showed no differences in the safety profiles in trophectoderm biopsy procedure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 27-30 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Feb 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Jo et al.
Keywords
- IVF
- Laser
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- Trophectoderm
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which is the safer method for trophectoderm biopsy in mouse blastocyst, mechanical or laser?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver